Jack in the Beanstalk Effect: Why good people steal.
I was musing this morning about illegal downloads of music. Last night I bought a prepaid card to Apple's iTunes Music Store for $15 at a drugstore. Each song is $0.99 so at the end of the card I will have 15 cents left over. The deal is to buy $99 worth of song and the 100th one comes with the change.
Why Is it so wrong or looked down upon to actually buy music when anyone can import their own collection or download from other users with P2P (peer to peer) technolgoy? Its gotta be a cultural phenomena. Personally, I won't be spending a lot of money on music downloads but I wanted to see how or if it was so awful to actually buy the songs.
iTunes makes it so easy. Although I hear that if you don't have an ipod, forget about putting the songs on other mp3 players. They say on the site that you have access to unlimited burns of the songs you buy. That's good. But I've read that the format that downloads is the AAC format which doesn't burn to .mp3 format for MP3 discs. That's not good. They also say on the site that you can share your music with 5 total computers/devices as part of your usage agreement which is Fair, I suppose. Then they have something they call "burning playlists" which you can do only 7 times. Technical details that get in the way. I'm going to test the MP3 disc later today.
What woke me from my slumber this morning was the big question of why good people felt alright downloading content and software. Does Hamarabi's Code not apply to the internet? An upload for an upload? Because the content ownership is not so much physical as it is conceptual maybe it doesn't culturally fall under the guidelines of Theft. Good people know not to take things from shelves, people's homes, etc...
Although, on a side note, I've noticed some people like to eat grapes at the supermarket. How is the cashier supposed to weigh them if they're in your stomach? Totally a pet peeve of mine... If you can't wait to consume the food until after you purchase it, there's something wrong. Same as eating candy bars and drinking sodas while in the store. It's not yours until you pay for it! Just thinking about it gets my goat.
The second Theory is about money. Perhaps we feel like we've paid enough for the technology to access the internet. or maybe we feel that internet access fees through AOL or our DSL service provider count as the toll. To pay again for services or downloads while online is as foreign to us as Flight Attendents on airplains coming through the cabin and demanding payment halfway through the flight. They do, to some extent these days. They make you pay to listen to the movie playing or for the food or alcohol they serve. Perhaps a better example would be if you were listening to the radio and the hit song was just about to come on but the radio jockey announces, that to listen to it you have to be either a privaleged person or you could swipe your credit card and purchase listening rights. Money and entitlement certainly go hand in hand in our social paradigms.
My third conceptual idea about it all is the story and ultimate lessons of Jack and the Beanstalk. It teaches us to ignore the advise of our elders, leaders, lawmakers. It teaches us to be frivolous with our money. It teaches us to see how far we can go before getting caught.
And it teaches us in what circumstances that it's alright to steal:
Jack says we can do so as long as we are
1> helping ourselves. 2> helping others.
And most importantly 3> Taking from the Wealthy Giants (i.e. Industry).
